What Really Happens When You Mix Hard Fillers into Plastics?
Published: October 9, 2025 · Reading time: 6 minutes
Introduction
High-performance polymer applications increasingly rely on reinforcing fillers such as glass fibers, ceramic particles, and metal carbides to achieve the required strength, stiffness, thermal stability, or wear resistance. These fillers, typically used at loadings of 20–60 wt%, enable the production of structural parts in demanding industries like automotive, aerospace, and electronics. However, incorporating such hard, high-volume fillers into polymer matrices poses significant processing challenges, especially when using conventional twin-screw extruders.
Dispersion, Fiber Breakage, and Viscosity Control
Achieving uniform filler dispersion without agglomeration is essential for consistent mechanical performance. However, as filler content increases above 30-40 wt%, the melt viscosity rises significantly, often exceeding 5,000-20,000 Pa·s depending on the polymer and shear rate, making thorough mixing more difficult (Table 1).
For glass fiber-filled compounds, preserving fiber length is crucial. Excessive shear or high screw speeds (>200 rpm) can reduce average fiber lengths from the original 4-5 mm down to below 0.5 mm, severely diminishing tensile and impact properties. This is why many conventional extrusion setups introduce fibers downstream via side feeders to minimize mechanical degradation.
Table 1. Effect of Filler Loading on Melt Viscosity (Illustrative, 250 °C for PA6 / 370 °C for PEEK)
Filler Loading (wt%) | PA6 Viscosity (Pa·s) | PEEK Viscosity (Pa·s) | Processing Impact |
0–20 | 300–1,500 | 1,000–4,000 | Low viscosity, easy mixing |
30–40 | 4,000–9,000 | 12,000–20,000 | Difficult dispersion, torque rises |
50–60 | 15,000–25,000 | 35,000–50,000 | Very high viscosity, risk of poor mixing |
Thermal and Rheological Challenges
High filler loadings change the thermal conductivity of the compound, often increasing it by a factor of 2-3. This can lead to non-uniform melt temperatures, hotspots, and even thermal degradation of the matrix polymer. For example, ceramic-filled PEEK or PPA compounds require precise thermal zoning (e.g., 320-380°C in multiple zones) to maintain melt uniformity without degradation.
At the same time, the higher thermal mass of filler-rich compounds increases residence time, requiring careful balance between screw speed, temperature, and backpressure. Shear heating can further complicate melt control, especially in high-speed (300-600 rpm) twin-screw systems.
Volatile Management and Degassing
Many engineering polymers, such as PA6, PBT, and PC, are hygroscopic and must be dried to <0.05% moisture prior to processing. Moisture combined with high shear can cause hydrolysis, generating bubbles, splay, or even polymer chain scission. Twin-screw extruders must be equipped with venting ports or vacuum degassing zones to remove moisture and volatiles, particularly when filler surface treatments (e.g., silanes) are involved.
Micro-Compounders as a Wear-Resistant Solution for Processing Hard Materials
For formulation development and screening of new high-load compounds, micro-compounding systems offer significant advantages (Table 2). Instruments like the Xplore MC 15 HT or MC 40 provide torque capacities of up to 40 Nm, processing temperatures up to 450°C, and precise control over screw speed (5-500 rpm). More importantly, they require only 2-40 ml of material, making them ideal for cost-effective trials with expensive fillers and specialty polymers.
Table 2. Comparison: Twin-Screw Extruder vs. Micro-Compounder
Feature | Twin-Screw Extruder (Industrial) | Micro-Compounder (R&D) |
Material requirement | 10–100 kg per run | 2–40 ml per run |
Screw design | Parallel, special screw design required for every material | Fully-intermeshing conical screws with high precision, No need for a special screw design for every material, since the residence time can be controlled with the manual valve |
Wear sensitivity | High (needs coatings) | Barrel hardness of 63 ± 2 HRc and special coating: High precision and abrasion resistance |
Process control | Good, but large-scale | Very precise, rheological properties can be acquired during processing |
Ideal use | Industrial-scale compounding | Screening, formulation trials |
The fully-intermeshing co-rotating conical screw design ensures efficient dispersive and distributive mixing, even at high viscosities, enabling rapid screening and reproducibility across different filler types and polymer grades. The extra hardened barrel provides researchers to work with highly abrasive materials. Thanks to the high precision and abrasion resistance, the barrel geometry stays the same over the years that provides a reproducible and reliable results (i.e. mixing quality and rheology). The references listed in Table 3 correspond to studies from the literature that utilize Xplore micro-compounders for processing polymeric systems incorporating hard inorganic fillers.
Table 3. Some Examples from Literature using Xplore Micro-Compounders in Hard-Filler Systems
Polymer | Hard Filler Type & Concentration | Reference # |
PP | %30-40 Glass fiber | [1] |
PLLA and PLGA | %30 Ceramic fillers | [2] |
HDPE | %24 Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) | [3] |
Thermoplastic copolyester elastomers (COPE or TPE-E) and recycled COPEs (R-COPE) | %30 Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) | [4] |
In general, a key challenge stems from the abrasive nature of fillers like alumina (Mohs hardness ~9), silicon carbide (~9.5), or glass fibers (~6–7). These materials can cause wear by creating abrasive friction on screw flights and barrel liners, particularly under high-shear conditions (Table 4). Conventional twin-screw extruders generally use tool steel or hard coatings (such as tungsten carbide) coatings to extend screw life, but wear is often unavoidable in long production runs. This wear not only shortens equipment lifespan but also alters the process stability, torque profile and product quality over time.
In case of wear in conventional extruders, the screw and barrel, should be evaluated for repair or replacement based on a thorough economic analysis since they are both critical components with complex machining and heat treatment requirements.
Table 4. Typical Hard Fillers and Their Mohs Hardness
Filler Material | Mohs Hardness | Key Effect on Processing |
Glass fiber | 6–7 | Causes moderate screw/barrel wear |
Alumina (Al₂O₃) | ~9 | Highly abrasive, severe wear risk |
Silicon carbide | ~9.5 | Extreme wear, needs protective coatings |
Calcium carbonate | 3 | Low abrasion, easier processing |
Conclusion
Compounding hard, high-loading fillers into thermoplastics requires a sophisticated approach to equipment configuration, process control, and material handling. Wear resistance, thermal uniformity, filler dispersion, and fiber preservation must all be managed carefully to produce compounds with optimal performance. While conventional twin-screw extruders can meet these challenges in production, small-scale high-torque micro-compounders are powerful tools for R&D, offering the flexibility and control needed to innovate efficiently and faster.
References
- Krishnamoorthi R, Zhang S. Recycling of Glass Fiber Composites. University of Borås, School of Engineering (Master’s thesis, Advanced level). 2012.
- Damadzadeh B, Jabari H, Skrifvars M, Airola K, Moritz N, Vallittu PK. Effect of ceramic filler content on the mechanical and thermal behaviour of poly‑L‑lactic acid and poly‑L‑lactic‑co‑glycolic acid composites for medical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2010; 21(9): 2523–2531.
- Coban O, Bora M O, Kutluk T. Comparative study of volcanic particle and calcium carbonate filler materials in HDPE for thermal and mechanical properties. Polymer Composites. 2018; 39(S3): E1900–E1907.
- Sucu Y E, Dandan Doganci M. The effect of calcite on the mechanical, morphological and thermal properties of virgin and recycled thermoplastic copolyester elastomer composites. Journal of Vinyl & Additive Technology. 2025; 31(1): 211–223.